<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the president needs to take ownership of traditional American presidential and national iconography.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://empax.org/blog/why-the-president-needs-to-take-ownership-of-traditional-american-presidential-and-national-iconography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://empax.org/blog/why-the-president-needs-to-take-ownership-of-traditional-american-presidential-and-national-iconography</link>
	<description>Moving Big Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://empax.org/blog/why-the-president-needs-to-take-ownership-of-traditional-american-presidential-and-national-iconography/comment-page-1#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://empax.org/?p=1132#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Very compelling point.  In many other ways, Obama has already normalized and assumed many of the presidential traditions, which is not surprising giving the polarizing nature of the election process.

One thing though, is that they use the logo now generally for the &#039;Organizing for America&#039; push, which seems like it is driven more by Michelle than Barack.  In this regard if they somehow tweaked the original campaign logo to associate more with Michelle than Barack, I think that the unified spirit could continue without damaging Barack&#039;s image or making him seem like a renegade.

Anyway, just some thoughts, great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very compelling point.  In many other ways, Obama has already normalized and assumed many of the presidential traditions, which is not surprising giving the polarizing nature of the election process.</p>
<p>One thing though, is that they use the logo now generally for the &#8216;Organizing for America&#8217; push, which seems like it is driven more by Michelle than Barack.  In this regard if they somehow tweaked the original campaign logo to associate more with Michelle than Barack, I think that the unified spirit could continue without damaging Barack&#8217;s image or making him seem like a renegade.</p>
<p>Anyway, just some thoughts, great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefoff</title>
		<link>http://empax.org/blog/why-the-president-needs-to-take-ownership-of-traditional-american-presidential-and-national-iconography/comment-page-1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>thefoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://empax.org/?p=1132#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Good point. I agree with you that &quot;ABC&quot; needs to go in Washington. I really believe there comes a time to be fully governing. I think some other folks in D.C. could use that message as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I agree with you that &#8220;ABC&#8221; needs to go in Washington. I really believe there comes a time to be fully governing. I think some other folks in D.C. could use that message as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

