<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Empax &#187; good magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://empax.org/tag/good-magazine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://empax.org</link>
	<description>Moving Big Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Better Than Good, It&#8217;s Wired!</title>
		<link>http://empax.org/blog/its-better-than-good-its-wired</link>
		<comments>http://empax.org/blog/its-better-than-good-its-wired#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ehud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://empax.org/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://empax.org/blog/its-better-than-good-its-wired"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="143" height="143" src="http://empax.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wired_cow-143x143.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Info graphic from Wired Magazine" title="Info graphic from Wired Magazine" /></a>There's only one source for info-graphics that's found the best synergy between function and form, in my humble opinion, and that's Wired Magazine.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://empax.org/blog/its-better-than-good-its-wired/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good intentions are not enough</title>
		<link>http://empax.org/blog/good-intentions-are-not-enough</link>
		<comments>http://empax.org/blog/good-intentions-are-not-enough#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ehud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://empax.org/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://empax.org/blog/good-intentions-are-not-enough"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="143" src="http://empax.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/greasingthewheels-small-143x143.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Another bad info graphic from Good Magazine" /></a>I'm sure Good Magazine has good intentions. They stand for good causes. They care deeply about some of the most important issues of this century. But when you try very hard to look good, you can end up being elitist and self-absorbed. Readers or web users end up with a message that prefers form over function instead of trying to create a synergy between them.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://empax.org/blog/good-intentions-are-not-enough/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
